Feedback about the inclusion of New Fast line art feature

[raghukamath]

@elevate

there’s unpleasantness no matter how reasonably someone expresses valid concerns about ai/intel/attitude to users.

You are not at at all listening to us and are implying that the feature that is going to be implemented will be bad, even though we are repeatedly telling you it is not like other generative AI.You are blindly making assumptions. Your concerns were listened and we (the forum members here not the devs) told you that it is not the same. So why are you jumping to conclusions.

On another note let us see what assumptions and false statements you made. I am quoting some text and calling out falsehoods from your first post -

@elevate

Also seeing comment that KDE can be trusted … they run telemetry even in Kate, their text document software. KDE telemetry is well-known and generally disliked if privacy is valued … thankfully some distros remove kuserfeedback.

This is false. kuserfeedback is off by default officially. If it is on ask your distro why it is. Also they do not get any meaningful information and the information they get is anonymized. You know it comes under GDPR and KDE is serious about this. You can see this forum too we do not have any trackers here. The only trackers you will see is from youtube videos that people post here. This is not even in krita why bring this up here.

@elevate

left because of the unpleasant response to expressing ai concerns.

Can’t say anything without context. We have a massive thread talking about AI. Where people like me have expressed grave concern over unethical AI and usage of artwork without artist consent.

@elevate

Why was this ai linework not proposed as a plugin and shot down then, rather than announcing it when it’s nearly ready and soon to be fully included into krita

This is false. It is not nearly ready it is in development and it is announced without any malicious intent of hiding like your implying here.

@elevate

Why is krita not instead including something similar to glaze/nightshade?

Because those are closed source and they do use the very model that you despise. If someone implements a plugin or feature making use of these feature I am sure people will not say no but for that these things needs to be compatible with Krita’s license.

@elevate

One of the many examples why ai in krita WILL get worse unless people act strongly against it … “I don’t think we’re going to have the feature of retraining the network in Krita - at least it’s not planned now.” … not until intel suggest doing something ai again and send cash, at least.

Again making assumptions and spreading FUD. making false assumptions on bad faith and accusing the team of malice done for money.

I have given many example of your bad faith if you really want to join the discussion stop accusing people and put forth your point without making wrong and false assumptions. These are literally symptoms of spreading misinformation by making false assumptions. I have given enough benefit of doubt to you but you seem to be here for spreading false information based on your own false assumptions.