Hi @tiar
Many thanks for this proposal
![]()
The idea is really good, and being able to manage and organize assistants (through a layer or a dedicated assistant tree) is really interesting (at least for me)
Concerning the 1st case, having assistants on a “mask” under a layer, I have 2 questions:
-
Is it possible to have many assistants per mask, or only one assistant per mask?
– First case (many assistant available on a mask) seems to be a better possibility
– Concerning this caseWill it be possible to implement it on same mask only or using all visible/active masks for current layer?
-
If implemented through mask, don’t forget to update PyKrita API to, at least, being able to access/create/rename/delete assistant mask as it’s currently possible for all other layer/masks (at least, the basic Node class methods
– being able to create/update/delete an assistant on a mask in an another thing, even if it would be really great it’s probably not mandatory for a first released version
Grum999